Exploration of using “distance-to-bound” to manipulate the difficulty during motor imagery BCI training after stroke – A clinical two-cases study
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Objective
Motor Imagery-based Brain-Computer Interfaces (MI-BCIs) is a promising technology for neurorehabilitation after stroke. However, many face challenges in using a BCI because they fail to produce discriminable patterns in their brain activity. Personalizing the BCI task difficulty could help the learning process of these users but there is currently very limited knowledge on which methods can be used online. Our aim was to explore a distance-to-bound approach for adapting MI BCI task difficulty in real time.
Approach
Two chronic stroke patients performed 12 BCI training sessions over 4 weeks during which they performed MI of open– and close hand movements and received continual visual feedback based on multivariate decoding of ongoing electroencephalogram (EEG) activity. We increased the difficulty and maintained it by adapting it in real time based on distance-to-bound decoding metrics and using a multiple-session design we investigated the stability of this approach and how it related to MI-related EEG activity of each patient.
Main results
We show that patients had to produce stronger alpha and beta event-related desynchronization (ERD) activity across the sensorimotor cortical areas of the brain to receive positive feedback. In addition, we show that the online adaptation converged within sessions as well as accommodating for drift in the data both within and between sessions. We suggest that the distance-to-bound approach can effectively be used to control BCI task difficulty and potentially guide patients to produce functionally relevant activity patterns. However, from our results, stronger sensorimotor ERD activity did not consistently correlate to improved motor function. Clinical assessments showed that both patients improved in motor function (+4 and +8.7 change in Fugl-Meyer assessment for upper extremity), however, the correlation to sensorimotor ERD activity was positive for one patient and negative for the other (Pearson’s rho = 0.95,-0.80, p = 0.05, 0.18). These results indicate that the translation of distance-to-bound outputs to feedback needs to be individually tailored considering the stroke lesion and EEG activity profiles for each patient.
Significance
This study provides valuable insights and considerations for BCI difficulty adaptation in the aim of developing more effective training protocols in BCI-based stroke rehabilitation.
Trial registration
The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT03994042 ) and complied with local rules and regulations according to the Swedish Ethics Review Authority (dnr. 2019-01577).
