Understanding Patient Perceptions of Genetic Testing to Predict Type 2 Diabetes Risk After Gestational Diabetes
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Aims
Women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) face increased lifetime risk of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Genetic risk-predictive testing could help identify those at highest risk and guide preventative care. We aimed to assess perceptions of genetic risk scores to help inform future implementation.
Methods
An online survey of 112 women with current or prior GDM assessed willingness for genetic and non-genetic risk testing, attitudes lifestyle motivation, and data-use concerns. Quantitative analyses were complemented by thematic analysis of free-text responses.
Results
Overall, willingness was high for both genetic testing (83.9%) and non- genetic (90.2%), with no significant difference between them (p = 0.083). Participants identifying as White reported greater willingness for genetic testing (p = 0.020) and stronger agreement that testing should be available on the NHS (p = 0.032) than N=non-White participants. Attitudes toward genetic testing were positive and associated with both willingness to test and support for NHS availability (p < 0.001). Younger participants were more motivated to modify lifestyle behaviours (p = 0.015). Overall, concerns around data collection were low; although free-text responses highlighted health insurance implications, psychological burden, actionability of results, and timing of testing as salient themes.
Conclusions
Women with GDM were receptive to genetic risk-prediction for T2DM, with low concerns around data usage. Demographic differences in acceptability and motivation highlight the need for inclusive, targeted communications and lifestyle support alongside integration testing into postnatal-GDM care.
What is already known?
We know that women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) have an increased risk of developing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) later in life. Genetic risk scores can stratify women by their likelihood of developing T2DM following GDM. This risk information could help to inform women’s lifestyle choices and help prevent progression to T2DM. However, evidence is limited regarding women’s willingness to undergo genetic testing, how risk information might shape lifestyle behaviours, and their concerns about data collection and privacy.
What this study has found?
Our study found that our participants with current or previous GDM were fairly receptive to genetic testing to predict their future risk of T2DM. There was no significant difference between reported acceptability of a non-genetic test and a genetic test. Participants held positive attitudes towards genetic testing and fairly low concerns about data use and privacy. However, the acceptability of this testing and motivation for lifestyle changes varied by participant demographics (including age, education and ethnicity). Additionally, free-text responses identified concerns over implications for health insurance, the timing of testing, psychological burden of knowing results and the actionability of results.
What are the implications of the study?
To support equitable engagement and uptake of genetic risk-prediction testing, inclusive education and communication strategies are needed - particularly on the actionability of results and data collection/storage policies. Although not directly measured, our findings point to the value of culturally responsive, trust-building communication—delivered with cultural humility and empathy—to address uncertainties and enable informed choice. These findings support the use of genetic predictive testing within postnatal GDM care in addition to targeted interventions to support lifestyle changes and prevent progression to type 2 diabetes.
