Cost-effectiveness of maternal vaccine and/or monoclonal antibody strategies against respiratory syncytial virus in Belgian infants
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
The respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) burden and cost-effectiveness of infant RSV immunisation was evaluated by comparing seven strategies in terms of costs and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs): no universal immunisation, year-round or seasonal maternal vaccination (MV), year-round or seasonal nirsevimab (NmAb) at birth, seasonal NmAb plus a catch-up for infants≤6-month and a combined MV+NmAb strategy. Seasonal NmAb with catch-up was most effective, while seasonal MV was least effective, but most cost-effective for healthcare at current list prices (MV €186, NmAb €778). Extensive trade-offs between NmAb and MV show at which cost per dose which strategy would be deemed cost-effective. At willingness-to-pay €35,000/QALY gained, seasonal NmAb+catch-up was preferred if NmAb<€210; otherwise, seasonal or year-round MV was preferred when MV < €220 or < €75, respectively. The combined strategy became optimal at low MV and NmAb cost levels. Besides price level, cost-effectiveness was most sensitive to RSV hospital burden.