Mobile Objective Diagnostics of Macular Degeneration using Dark-Adapted Visual Evoked Potentials
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Purpose
Delayed Dark-Adapted vision Recovery (DAR) is a known biomarker for Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD); however, its measurement is often cumbersome for both patients and examiners. In this study, we developed NeuroVEP, a portable, wireless, and user-friendly system designed to objectively assess Dark-Adapted Visual Evoked Potentials (DAVEP).
Methods
NeuroVEP consists of a headset with a smartphone that delivers controlled photo-bleach and monocular pattern reversal stimuli while utilizing custom electroencephalography (EEG) electrodes and electronics to measure DAVEP. The system allows for separate analysis of the near peripheral and macular visual field of each eye, completing the test in a comfortable, single-session format (<25 minutes) without requiring subjective patient feedback.
The NeuroVEP test protocol included: (i) Mesopic luminance pattern reversal VEP for macular and peripheral regions (5 mins), (ii) Full-field photopic pattern reversal VEP (2.5 mins), (iii) Scotopic luminance DAVEP recovery post photo-bleach (up to 15 mins), measured simultaneously from both eyes.
The data were analyzed for 66 participants, divided into four cohorts: (A) Age-matched healthy controls with no ophthalmic pathologies (n=10), (B) Early-stage AMD (AREDS1) (n=19), (C) Intermediate-stage AMD (AREDS3) (n=18), (D) Advanced-stage AMD (AREDS4/5) (n=19).
Advanced signal processing and machine learning methodologies were applied to filter and process the VEP responses from the DAR segment of the experiment. 13 discriminating features were extracted from the processed signals and classified for each participant using a Bayesian statistical framework and Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM).
Results
The algorithm demonstrated: 86% accuracy in early-stage AMD detection (Healthy vs. Early AMD) (Sensitivity: 97%, Specificity: 65%, AUC-ROC: 0.81 and AUC-PR: 0.92) and 93% accuracy in overall AMD detection (Healthy vs. All AMD stages) (Sensitivity: 98%, Specificity: 65%, AUC-ROC: 0.82 and AUC-PR: 0.97).
Conclusions
We successfully developed a portable, objective user-friendly VEP system and an advanced Bayesian-GMM statistical analysis framework capable of identifying DAR deficits in AMD patients. This novel technology shows high potential for early AMD detection and could serve as a non-invasive, objective diagnostic tool for AMD screening in clinical and remote settings.