A Pilot Feasibility Study Evaluating a Novel Digitally-Enhanced Community Health Worker-Led Intervention Delivering Early Stepped Palliative Care, Care Navigation, Patient Education and Clinical Trial Engagement in Pancreatic Cancer Patients
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with substantial morbidity, poor quality of life, and poor overall survival. Early palliative care (PC) has been shown to improve quality of life and reduce symptom burden in PDAC, but specialty PC services are often unavailable for this fast progressing illness and even then are only utilized by a minority of PDAC patients. In response, we developed a digitally enhanced CHW-led intervention. This paper focuses on the feasibility of this PDAC intervention.
Methods
Adults (aged ≥18 years) with newly diagnosed PDAC (within 2 weeks of diagnosis) were enrolled in a single-arm pilot feasibility mixed-methods study from January to August 2025 (N=48). Based on qualitative feedback from patients and caregivers the intervention involved early palliative care engagement, patient education, care navigation, and providing targeted financial resources for patients and family caregivers (FCGs). The digital component involves using short YouTube educational videos and Twilio Short Message Service (SMS) to administer the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale weekly with patients with high symptom scores stepped up to PC visits. The CHW-led intervention was delivered over 4 weeks with data collection occurring over an additional 8 weeks. Feasibility outcomes were patient engagement with the CHW and completion of the intervention. The acceptability outcome was defined using the RE-AIM framework. Secondary outcomes include Quality of Life (QoL), Advanced Care Planning (ACP) compliance rates, financial toxicity, and time toxicity.
Results
The median age of pts (N=48) was 69 (IQR 62-76), and 29 (60%) were Hispanic. 52% (25) had metastatic PDAC, 14 (29.1%) had borderline resectable PDAC, and 9 (18.8%) had resectable PDAC at diagnosis. Four patients died prior to the intervention completion, while the remaining patients completed the intervention. Regarding acceptability, 94% of patients completely agreed that the intervention met their approval. Themed common responses highlighted by patients centered around the critically important role of the CHW in the process, including in appointment an referral scheduling, especially as symptoms worsened. Patient’s physical HRQoL, symptom burden, and rates of financial toxicity decreased from baseline to 12 weeks, while 83% of patients completed ACP by 12 weeks.
Conclusions
Our digitally-enhanced CHW-led intervention delivering early stepped PC was feasible and acceptable to PDAC patients. The intervention was associated with improvement in symptom burden, reduction in financial and time toxicity and improved ACP planning rates. Future prospective comparative studies are needed to understand the intervention’s ability to help manage the inevitable disease progression involved in late stage PDAC, including in QoL, financial and time toxicity, and ACP.