Specialization of ubiquitin ligases to distinct nucleic acid sensors
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Innate immune sensors rely on ubiquitin ligases to calibrate antiviral responses, yet the rules governing substrate recognition by SPRY-containing ligases remain poorly defined. Here, we establish a large-scale structure-based screening pipeline using AlphaFold to systematically predict interactions between human nucleic acid sensors and SPRY-containing proteins. Our approach uncovered novel transient or degradation-sensitive interactions that are typically missed by proteomic methods, including a labile TRIM58-OAS1 complex. We show that SPRY domains dictate substrate specificity: TRIM25 preferentially engages ZAP, whereas Riplet favors RIG-I. Domain-swapping experiments demonstrated that SPRY domains are sufficient to reprogram ligase specificity and antiviral activity. Phylogenetic and structural analyses revealed that TRIM25 and Riplet evolved from a common ancestor but diverged in coiled-coil architecture and oligomeric state, while retaining conserved substrate preferences. Residue-level modeling identified hypervariable SPRY loops as critical determinants of recognition, a prediction validated by targeted mutagenesis of the TRIM25-ZAP interface. Finally, we show that distinct SPRY-containing ligases surveil self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) vaccines: Riplet-RIG-I primarily responds when RNA is delivered by lipofection, whereas TRIM25-ZAP is engaged upon lipid nanoparticle delivery, with functional consequences for vaccine expression. Together, these findings demonstrate that SPRY domains encode recognition logic for ubiquitin ligases, that AlphaFold enables discovery of otherwise hidden interactions and that these principles have direct implications for RNA-based therapeutics.