Limitations of PICADAR as a diagnostic predictive tool for primary ciliary dyskinesia
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
The Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia Rule (PICADAR) is a diagnostic predictive tool currently recommended by the European Respiratory Society (ERS) to assess the likelihood of a primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) diagnosis. Despite its recommendation according to the current ERS PCD diagnostic guideline, the performance of the PICADAR remains insufficiently studied.
Methods
We evaluated the sensitivity of PICADAR in 269 individuals with genetically confirmed PCD. Using an initial question, PICADAR rates all individuals without daily wet cough negative for PCD. PICADAR evaluates seven questions in the daily wet cough group. We here calculated test sensitivity based on the proportion of individuals scoring ≥5 points as recommended. Subgroup analyses examined the impact of laterality defects and predicted hallmark ultrastructural defects.
Results
18 individuals (7%) reported no daily wet cough ruling out PCD according to PICADAR. The median PICADAR score was 7 (IQR: 5 – 9), with an overall sensitivity of 75% (202/269). Sensitivity was higher in individuals with laterality defects (95%; median score: 10; IQR 8-11) compared to those with situs solitus (61%, median score: 6; IQR 4-8; p*<0.0001). Further stratification by associated ciliary ultrastructure showed higher sensitivity in individuals with hallmark defects (83%) versus those without (59%, p*<0.0001).
Conclusion
The PICADAR has limited sensitivity, particularly in individuals without laterality defects or absent hallmark ultrastructural defects. Therefore, it should be used with caution as the primary factor for estimating the likelihood of PCD. Alternative predictive tools are needed, particularly for PCD individuals with normal body composition and normal ultrastructure.
