FLASH or flare: variable intestinal toxicity results in a mouse model following proton pencil beam scanning irradiation on a clinical superconducting synchrocyclotron
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background and aims
Ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) irradiation is a promising technique to reduce radiation-induced normal tissue toxicities while preserving antitumor efficacy. We evaluated the feasibility and intestinal sparing potential of FLASH irradiation using a clinical synchrocyclotron-based proton therapy system generating a pulsed beam.
Material and methods
C57BL/6J mice received abdominal irradiation (2×2 cm) in transmission mode at FLASH (>60 Gy/s) or conventional (CONV, 0.5 Gy/s) dose rates using a 230 MeV superconducting synchrocyclotron proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) system. Two independent irradiation rounds were performed. Endpoints included 75-day survival, regenerating crypt counts, whole blood counts at day 4, and intestinal wall thickness, cyst-like structures, and cytokine levels at day 75.
Results
In the first irradiation round, survival after 14.5 Gy FLASH was markedly improved (5/8 survivors) compared to CONV (0/8), whereas in the second round, survival rates were identical (2/7 per group). Overall, pooled data indicated improved survival with 14.5 Gy FLASH. The LD50 was 13.74 Gy in CONV and 14.48 Gy in FLASH mode, corresponding to a FLASH modifying factor of 0.95. FLASH at 14.5 Gy increased regenerating crypt numbers compared to CONV, but only in the first round, supporting survival outcomes. No significant differences were observed in whole blood counts, cytokine profiles, or long-term intestinal structural changes between groups.
Conclusion
FLASH proton therapy delivered with a clinical synchrocyclotron PBS system can reduce short-term gastrointestinal toxicity in mice. However, inconsistent results across irradiation rounds highlight limitations of this model for reliable FLASH studies.