Tract-based Lesion Metrics for Resolving the Clinico-Radiological Paradox in Multiple Sclerosis

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

The clinico-radiological paradox in multiple sclerosis (MS) arises because conventional MRI measures, particularly total lesion volume, fail to capture the true burden of disability. These broad volumetric measures overlook the dual influence of where lesions occur and what is their microstructural composition. This study aimed to improve the clinical relevance of lesion analysis in MS by refining both how and where lesions are measured. While traditional approaches emphasize anatomical lesion burden, studies of structural disconnection in neurological disease have shown that functional deficits often arise from tract-specific interruptions within distributed brain networks. We hypothesized that filtering lesions through clusters of functionally meaningful white matter tracts, rather than broad anatomical compartments, would enable more accurate identification of clinically relevant damage. To test our hypothesis, we studied 132 participants, including 89 patients with MS (49 relapsing–remitting, 17 primary progressive, 23 secondary progressive; 62 women and 27 men; mean age 41 years, range 18–68) and 43 healthy controls (28 women and 15 men; mean age 36 years, range 23–58). All underwent standardized 3 Tesla MRI including fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), T1 mapping, magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) with fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD). Lesions were segmented from FLAIR, mapped to both classical anatomical regions and individualized white matter tracts, then enriched with quantitative MRI metrics.

Associations between imaging measures and disability were evaluated using Spearman or Pearson correlations, and predictive performance was assessed with ridge-penalized regression across Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), motor and cognitive scores, as well as progression risk defined by the MSPro scale. Filtering lesions through functionally critical tracts revealed associations obscured by conventional approaches. Tract-based lesion T1 values correlated more strongly with disability than classical regional metrics (e.g. EDSS r = 0.83 in occipitoparietal tracts vs r = 0.47 in periventricular regions). Multimodal tract-specific metrics including T1, MTR, FA, and MD significantly predicted disability. Importantly, using MSPro, tract-based T1 stratified patients with relapsing–remitting MS into stable versus early-progressive groups with 92% accuracy (area under the curve = 0.89).

By integrating lesion location and microstructural composition, tract-based quantitative MRI resolves key aspects of the clinico-radiological paradox. This framework enhances disability prediction, enables early identification of patients at risk of progression, and provides a clinically interpretable biomarker to support individualized monitoring and therapeutic decision-making.

Article activity feed