MOAST: Mechanism of Action Similarity Tool

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Determining the mechanism of action (MOA) for natural products remains a significant bottleneck in drug discovery, particularly for researchers with limited computational resources or small compound libraries. Traditional approaches require screening large numbers of annotated compounds alongside unknowns, which is cost-prohibitive, or depend on complex machine learning models that need substantial computational resources and large datasets.

Here, we present a dissertation chapter excerpt: MOAST (Mechanism of Action Similarity Tool), a BLAST-inspired computational workflow that addresses these limitations by providing rapid MOA hypotheses for newly screened compounds. This chapter investigates two complementary approaches: a kernel density estimation (KDE) method providing statistical significance measures and E-values for MOA class membership, and a CatBoost machine learning classifier for multi-class prediction with ranked outputs.

Using cytological profiling data from HeLa and A549 cell lines, MOAST achieved 22% accuracy for the top 5 predictions among ∼ 300 MOA classes, with the CatBoost classifier reaching 10% balanced accuracy—significantly better than the ∼ 3 % reported in literature. The tool suggests a 0.8 prediction probability threshold for trustworthy results and demonstrates robust performance across multiple feature reduction strategies.

MOAST provides a practical, accessible solution that bridges traditional phenotypic screening and modern computational approaches, making MOA determination feasible for researchers with limited resources while maintaining statistical rigor and interpretability.

Article activity feed