Intrinsic timing, not temporal prediction, underlies ramping dynamics in visual and parietal cortex during passive behavior

Read the full article

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Neural activity following regular sensory events can reflect either the elapsed time since the previous event ( temporal signaling ) or temporal predictions and prediction errors about the next event ( temporal predictive processing ). These mechanisms are often confounded, yet dissociating them is essential for understanding neural circuit computations.

We addressed this by performing two-photon calcium imaging from distinct cell types (excitatory, VIP, and SST) in layer 2/3 of the medial visual cortex (VIS) and the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) while awake mice passively viewed audio-visual stimuli under temporal contexts with different inter-stimulus interval (ISI) distributions. Computational modeling revealed distinct functional clusters of neurons, stimulus-activated (ramp-down) and stimulus-inhibited (ramp-up), with characteristic kinetics and area- and cell-type-specific biases.

Importantly, all functional clusters were invariant to temporal predictability, shifted immediately when temporal statistics changed, and existed even in naïve mice—findings inconsistent with predictions from temporal predictive processing frameworks. Elapsed-interval information could nonetheless be decoded, and heterogeneous kinetics underlay how well each cluster represented interval duration, leading to a distributed, learning-independent population code for time.

These results demonstrate that activity in VIS and PPC arises from stimulus-evoked dynamics whose intrinsic evolution encodes elapsed time, rather than from temporal predictive processing, redefining the mechanistic origin of ramping and omission-related activity in visual and parietal cortices. We propose that temporal predictive processing may instead be implemented in other circuits or recruited in VIS/PPC during task-engaged behavior.

Graphical Abstract

Article activity feed