Prone Positioning in a North American Cohort of Hypoxemic Patients on Mechanical Ventilation
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Objective
Use of prone positioning increased among mechanically ventilated patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, but it is unknown whether implementation of this life-saving intervention was sustained. Thus, we aimed to evaluate peri-pandemic trends in proning use.
Design
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of proning use among mechanically ventilated adults, with proning rates compared across pre-pandemic (1/2018-2/2020), pandemic (3/2020-2/2022), and post-pandemic (3/2022-12/2024) periods.
Setting
37 North American hospitals
Patients
Mechanically ventilated patients with persistent moderate-to-severe hypoxemia (PaO 2 /F i O 2 ≤150 mmHg, F i O 2 ≥0.6, and positive end-expiratory pressure ≥5 cmH 2 O).
Intervention
Proning within 12 hours of meeting study hypoxemia criteria.
Measurements and Main Results
Among 5,760 proning-eligible patients, 1,737 (30.2%) received proning: 8.0% pre-pandemic, 44.6% pandemic, and 19.9% post-pandemic. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for proning during pandemic versus pre-pandemic periods was 8.25 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 6.35-10.70) and pandemic versus post-pandemic, 2.76 (95% CI: 1.83-4.17). Proning varied widely by hospital and was quantified with the median odds ratio (median change in odds of proning an identical patient admitted at a lower versus higher proning hospital) of 2.54 (95% Credible Interval (CrI): 1.75-4.58) pre-pandemic, 2.33 (95% CrI: 1.92-3.04) pandemic, and 2.58 (95% CrI: 1.99-3.73) post-pandemic. Pandemic-period patients with SARS-CoV2 were proned more than those without (OR: 4.55, [95% CI: 3.85-5.56]), but pandemic-period patients without SARS-CoV2 were still proned more than pre-pandemic (OR: 3.87, [95% CI: 2.92-5.13]) or post-pandemic patients (OR: 1.37, [95% CI: 1.03-1.83]).
Conclusions
In a North American cohort of proning-eligible patients, proning increased during the pandemic and then declined. Interventions that improve implementation of this life-saving treatment are urgently needed.
