Antibiotic Stewardship in Lower Urinary Tract Infections of the Elderly at a District General Hospital

Read the full article

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the management of lower urinary tract infections (LUTIs) in elderly inpatients, to determine the prevalence of inappropriate treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB), and to assess the impact of targeted educational interventions on antibiotic prescribing accuracy. Settings: An acute general hospital in East Midlands of the United Kingdom. Participants: Seventy-seven patients aged 65 and older who have had a urine culture due to suspected diagnosis of lower urinary tract infection. Design: Prospective case series of emergency hospital admissions collected over an 8-month period to acute elderly medicine wards. Implementation of two educational interventions at the second and third month of the study period. Methods: Data relating to demographics, catheterization status, presenting symptoms, urine dipstick usage, culture collection methods, and antibiotic prescription patterns were obtained from electronic and paper records as part of audit number 1688 registered at the hospital trust. Interventions included the display of an informational poster based on NICE guidelines and a dedicated educational teaching session for clinicians. In total, 19 patients were involved pre-intervention. A total of 58 patients were involved post-intervention. Among the post intervention cohort, 32 patients were involved post-poster intervention, and 17 patients were involved post-teaching intervention. Several months following intervention, 9 patients were involved in the study. Results: Initial findings revealed suboptimal adherence to national guidelines, with 50% (n=5) of asymptomatic patients with negative cultures inappropriately prescribed antibiotics. Following the poster intervention, prescribing was found to be three and a half times more appropriate for LUTIs than the pre-intervention period (OR=3.61, 95%CI 1.08 to 12.03, (Ꭓ2=4.56, p=0.033). Compared to the pre-intervention period antibiotic prescribing was found to be five times (OR=5.05, 95%CI 0.96 to 26.66, Ꭓ2=3.91, p=0.048) more appropriate after all educational interventions implemented. Catheter-associated infections also showed a significant reduction, albeit with poor statistical correlation. Conclusion: Targeted educational interventions, including informational posters and teaching sessions, were observed to improve appropriate diagnosis and antibiotic prescribing for LUTIs and ASB in elderly hospitalized patients within the scope of this study.

Article activity feed