Evaluating the outcome and impact of an integrated knowledge translation approach in the development of an equity reporting guideline: a cross-sectional survey

Background Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) involves active engagement of knowledge users in co-producing research, ensuring their perspectives shape study design, analysis, and reporting. This can strengthen justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion (JEDI) considerations. We adopted an IKT approach in developing STROBE-Equity, an equity-focused extension of the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology guideline. The perceived value of embedding JEDI principles in reporting guideline development is unknown. This study evaluates the outcomes and impact of such an approach. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey of STROBE-Equity project members (n=68) between July–August 2024. The 19-item survey assessed disciplinary background, participation, and perceived benefits, challenges, and impacts of the JEDI-enhanced IKT approach. Inductive content analysis was used to identify themes, which were quantified with frequencies and percentages. Results Thirty-one members responded. Most were aged 35–54 (61%), female (55%), based in Canada (35%), and trained in epidemiology (61%). Reported benefits of IKT included integrating diverse perspectives, inclusive representation, and collaborative learning. Challenges involved accessibility and accommodations, consensus-building, and navigating power dynamics between researchers, policymakers, and those with lived experience. Participants perceived that IKT enhanced dissemination and uptake of STROBE-Equity, improved research design perspectives, and strengthened credibility and applicability. Engagement broadened understanding of social conditions and facilitated incorporation of end-user perspectives, increasing guideline acceptance. Conclusions A JEDI-enhanced IKT approach was viewed as beneficial for reporting guideline development, particularly in fostering inclusivity, strengthening credibility, and improving dissemination. Key challenges such as accessibility and balancing power dynamics highlight areas for improvement. Future research should refine participatory methods to further advance equity in research.