Cretaceous crocodyliform reconciles conflicting evidence on the Mesozoic paleogeography of Europe during the Gondwana-Laurasia split

Inferred biotic exchanges between Europe and Africa during the Cretaceous have been used to support the hypothesis that the complete separation of Europe from Gondwana postdated the split of the remaining Laurasian landmasses from Gondwana. Under this framework, Europe, conceptualized as part of a proposed ‘Eurogondwana’, is thought to have maintained biogeographic connections with Africa well into the Cretaceous. A key piece of evidence underpinning this hypothesis has been the crocodyliform Doratodon carcharidens from the Late Cretaceous of Europe, previously interpreted as closely related to Gondwanan taxa. However, the material attributed to this species is fragmentary, and its skeletal anatomy—critical for phylogenetic inference—remains poorly understood. Here we describe a new partial skull of Doratodon carcharidens which represents some of the most complete material of ‘Gondwanan’ taxa in the European Cretaceous. Our updated phylogenetic analysis unexpectedly and robustly places D. carcharidens among the Laurasian clade Paralligatoridae and reveals that morphological similarities to Gondwanan ziphosuchians, such as ziphodont dentition, are the result of ecomorphological convergence rather than shared ancestry. By reinterpreting the systematic position of further taxa representing biogeographic enigma, such as Ogresuchus furatus , our phylogeny implies a major role of the primary breakup of Pangea into Laurasia and Gondwana for crocodyliform divergence. A critical reassessment of the purported evidence for ‘Gondwanan’ fish and tetrapod immigrants in Europe reveals that it is largely based on highly fragmentary and sporadic specimens, as well as weakly supported phylogenetic hypotheses. Given the sparse and uneven Jurassic and Cretaceous fossil record in both Europe and Africa, it remains plausible that taxa previously interpreted as Gondwanan dispersers instead represent vicariant relicts. Our results conflict with recent paleobiogeographic scenarios, highlight the absence of compelling evidence for the Eurogondwana hypothesis and instead support a primary Gondwana-Laurasia split.