A domain-specific approach to characterizing falls efficacy post-stroke
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Objective
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that the construct of falls efficacy, as measured by the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale, is comprised of distinct factors in those with chronic stroke.
Design
This study is a cross-sectional analysis of pre-existing data from a research registry.
Setting
Academic institution.
Participants
248 community-dwelling adults history of one or more strokes, verified by CT/MRI report or past provider.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measure(s)
Goodness-of-Fit indices (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA), Comparative Fit Index (CFI), and Tucker-Lewis Fit Index (TLI)).
Results
To test our hypothesis that the ABC scale is comprised of distinct factors linked to the balance domains, we proposed that the ABC scale items are indicative of three subdomains, 1) anticipatory control, 2) walking balance, and 3) reactive balance. A confirmatory factor analysis was performed to test this hypothesized structure. We assigned ABC Q1,2,8,10-12 to walking balance, Q3-7,9 to anticipatory control, and Q13-16 to reactive balance. All indicators significantly loaded as hypothesized. Modification indices suggested that Q6, which asks about standing on a chair and reaching for something, might be multidimensional and load onto both the anticipatory control and reactive balance latent constructs. Therefore, confidence in reaching while on a stool reflects confidence in both anticipatory and reactive balance.
Conclusion(s)
These results suggest that the items in the ABC scale measure three subfactors that align with anticipatory control, walking balance, and reactive balance.
