Building trust through collaboration: A mixed-methods evaluation of San Francisco’s Pregnancy Village model of cross-sector care delivery

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background

Historical injustices, systemic racism, unequal healthcare access, and provider bias have fostered mistrust in healthcare institutions. Cross-sector collaborations between healthcare institutions and community-based organizations (CBOs), such as San Francisco’s Pregnancy Village (PV) model, could potentially build institutional trust in minoritized communities. This study primarily aimed to examine trust in PV, with secondary aims exploring participant perceptions of trust in the health system and CBOs, including their views on the health system’s involvement in PV.

Methods

Between July 2021 and June 2022, we conducted a convergent, mixed-methods study involving 116 survey participants (57 pregnant/postpartum individuals and 59 family members) and 18 semi-structured interviews (13 pregnant/postpartum people and five family members). Trust was assessed quantitatively using a seven-item scale (scores standardized to 0-100) and qualitatively with open-ended questions. We performed univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analyses of the quantitative data and thematic analyses of the qualitative data.

Results

The mean trust in PV score was 85.9/100 (SD = 18.9). Lower trust was observed among Latine participants, those with a history of preterm birth, and those experiencing food insecurity. Qualitative findings revealed that trust in both the health system and CBOs was shaped by receipt of person-centered care. Trust in CBOs was attributed to their focus on holistic care, relatability, and responsiveness to community needs. Distrust in the health system was shaped by experiences of racism and neglect. Participants held mixed views on the health system’s role in PV—some highlighted its positive contributions, while others voiced skepticism due to ongoing structural racism and inequities in care.

Conclusions

Participants perceived PV as trustworthy, with mixed views of the health system, generally positive perceptions of CBOs, and overall support for the health system’s involvement in PV despite lingering concerns. However, concerns about structural racism and healthcare inequities persist. Sustained cross-sector collaboration, guided by community priorities, is critical to building trust and addressing structural inequities.

Article activity feed