Estimating the effect of adhering to Canada’s Food Guide 2019 recommendations in older adults: a target trial emulation
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
The 2019 Canada’s Food Guide (CFG) provides universal recommendations to individuals aged 2 years or older. The extent to which these recommendations positively influence key health outcomes in older adults is unknown.
Objective
In community-dwelling adults aged 67-84 years and compared with habitual diet and physical activity, our objective was to estimate the 3-year difference in muscle strength, physical function, cardiometabolic health, and cognition according to the adherence to CFG recommendations (CFG), enhancements with additional protein foods (CFG-PRO), physical activity (PA) and both (CFG-PLUS).
Methods
Longitudinal non-experimental data from the NuAge study (n=1753, mean [SD] age, 74 [4], 52% females) were used to emulate a target trial based on a total of four annual measurements of dietary intakes and covariates. Dietary intakes were measured using up to three interviewer-administered 24-hour recalls at each time. Physical activity was estimated using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) questionnaire. Strength outcomes included handgrip, elbow flexor and quadriceps strength; function outcomes included “Timed-Up-and-Go”, walking speed; cardiometabolic health outcomes included waist circumference, blood pressure and fasting glucose, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); cognition was evaluated with the Modified Mini-Mental State exam. The hypothetical intervention was modelled using the parametric g-formula to account for confounding (e.g., individual factors, propensity to health-seeking behaviors, disease burden) and loss to follow-up.
Results
1561 participants were eligible for the target trial emulation. Compared with no change, CFG would have increased elbow flexor strength by 0.8 kg (95%CI: 0.2, 1.3), quadriceps strength by 0.8 kg (95%CI: 0.0, 1.7), walking speed by 0.03 m/s (95%CI: 0.00, 0.05), eGFR by 2.8 mL/min/1.73m² (95%CI: 0.7, 4.5) and reduced waist circumference by 1.0 cm (95%CI: -1.7, -0.3). Effect estimates were similar for the CFG-PRO intervention. However, the CFG-PLUS intervention would have slightly amplified these differences, especially for walking speed (vs. CFG, +0.06 m/s; 95%CI: 0.03, 0.08) and waist circumference (vs. CFG, -0.8 cm; 95%CI: -1.5, -0.2). The hypothetical interventions did not meaningfully affect handgrip strength.
Conclusion
Under strong assumptions, compared with no change, adhering to CFG 2019 recommendations over a 3-year follow-up improved strength and walking speed of adults aged 67 and older. Further increasing physical activity and protein food intake together improved walking speed to a clinically relevant extent. In view of the typical declines observed with no change in diet and physical activity, the improvements described would translate into attenuations of declines in strength and walking speed.
