Prevalence and Practice of Traditional Uvulectomy Among Sudanese Children and Adolescents, Along with Maternal Perception and Associated Risk Factors: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
Traditional uvulectomy (TU) is the removal of the uvula, either partially or totally by the traditional healer. It is prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa, driven by cultural beliefs and perceived therapeutic benefits, despite the risks of complications -bleeding, infections, and death, and limited data exist. Our study aimed to assess the prevalence and practice of traditional uvulectomy among Sudanese children and adolescents, along with maternal perceptions, and identify associated risk factors.
Method
A descriptive cross-sectional community-based study (from January to April 2025) involved 1,135 mothers of children ≤18 years, across more than ten states. Data were collected via face-to-face interviews using a validated structured questionnaire to assess the socio-demographics, TU perception, practice, and complications. A convenience sampling technique was used. We analyzed with R software, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
The prevalence was 15%, peaking in infants (<6 years: 16%) and adolescents (12–18 years: 17%). Maternal belief was significantly associated with younger child age (37% for 12–18 years vs 16% for 6–12 years; p<0.001). The reasons included breastfeeding difficulties (18%), cultural tradition (16%), and failure to thrive (13%). Mothers (45%) and grandmothers (41%) primarily decided to perform TU, with traditional healers conducting 55% of procedures using unsterilized tools. Complications included fever (35%), feeding difficulties (21%), and bleeding (13%). TU was associated with younger maternal age (median 22 years), lower education (21% illiterate), and tribal tradition (92% adherence), all p<0.001.
Conclusion
TU persists in Sudan due to cultural entrenchment, intergenerational influence, and healthcare barriers. Interventions must engage tribal leaders and healers, promote safer alternatives, and improve education and healthcare.
