Examining the impact of gestational diabetes genetic susceptibility variants on maternal glucose levels during and post-pregnancy
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Aim
Gestational diabetes (GDM) has important environmental and genetic components. Genetic variants associated with GDM (n=14 SNPs) were recently classified into 2 groups: those with stronger effects on type 2 diabetes than GDM (Class-T, 3 SNPs) and those with stronger effects on GDM than on type 2 diabetes (Class-G, 8 SNPs), leaving 3 SNPs unclassified. It was suggested that the Class-G variants contribute to hyperglycaemia predominantly during gestation, but it is not known whether the effects of the two variant classes on maternal glucose levels vary with pregnancy status. We aimed to compare the effects of GDM-associated variants on glucose levels (fasting glucose and 2-hour post-OGTT) measured during vs. after pregnancy in longitudinal cohorts.
Methods
We calculated genetic scores (GS) by class (T_GS and G_GS) and overall (All_GS) in 10,225 pregnant women and 4,763 women post-pregnancy (mean 10.5 years post pregnancy) from 8 datasets representing 4 ancestrally-diverse cohorts: EFSOCH, Gen3G, HAPO and FinnGeDi. We used linear regression models adjusted for ancestry principal components to investigate associations between standardised GS and glucose levels during or after pregnancy. Analyses were performed separately in each dataset and then combined using inverse-variance weighted random-effects meta-analyses.
Results
In the meta-analysis, All_GS was associated with fasting glucose both during and after pregnancy (β[95%CI], in mmol/L per 1SD higher GS = 0.06 [0.04;0.08] during vs. 0.06 [0.04;0.07] post-pregnancy). All_GS was also associated with 2-hour post-OGTT glucose levels during pregnancy but not after (0.10 [0.04; 0.15] during vs. 0.01 [-0.04; 0.07] post-pregnancy). Both G_GS and T_GS showed consistent associations with fasting glucose during and post pregnancy (0.06 [0.04; 0.08] during and 0.05 [0.03; 0.07] post pregnancy for G_GS; 0.02 [0.01; 0.02] during and 0.02 [-0.001; 0.05] post pregnancy for T_GS). G_GS showed weak evidence of association with 2-hour glucose levels during pregnancy (0.06 [-0.002; 0.11]) and no association with 2-hour glucose levels post pregnancy (-0.03 [-0.08; 0.03]). However, T_GS was associated with 2-hour glucose during pregnancy and post pregnancy (0.10 [0.04; 0.16] and 0.06 [0.01; 0.12]).
Conclusion
Genetic scores for GDM have consistent associations with fasting glucose levels during and after pregnancy. This finding suggests that biological pathways underlying GDM genetic susceptibility to fasting hyperglycaemia are not pregnancy specific. However, the results for All_GS and 2-hour glucose provide evidence that some genetic associations with postprandial glucose may be stronger in pregnancy and should be followed up in larger samples.
