The contribution of vestibular and proprioceptive signals to trunk stabilization varies between postural tasks and between walking speeds

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Stabilizing the upright posture of the trunk relies on vestibular and proprioceptive afference. Previous studies found that the feedback responses to sensory afference vary between postures and tasks. We investigated whether and how vestibular and proprioceptive afference contribute to trunk stabilization during different postural tasks, and during walking at different speeds. Twelve healthy adults performed tasks in a random order: sitting, standing on the right foot or both feet, and treadmill walking at five speeds: 0.8, 2.0, 3.2, 4.3 and 5.5 km/h, while exposed to unilateral muscle vibration on the right paraspinal muscles at the level of the second lumbar vertebra, or to a step-like electrical vestibular stimulation (EVS) with the anode behind the left ear. The mediolateral displacements of markers at the sixth thoracic level and sacrum in the global coordinate system were used to evaluate the responses to sensory stimulation. No significant responses to EVS at T6 and sacrum level were found in sitting and standing. Responses to muscle vibration were significant and differed between unipedal standing compared to sitting and bipedal standing. The latter suggests a different interpretation of the sensation of muscle lengthening in these postures. The magnitude of the responses to both stimuli increased from very slow speeds to moderate speeds. This may indicate that a different control strategy is adopted in walking at slow speeds compared to walking at faster speeds. From moderate to high speeds, the responses decreased, suggesting a decreased demand for feedback control at higher speeds.

Article activity feed