A miniaturized, high-throughput aqueous solvent-centric method for protein solubility screening

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

Efficient access to soluble recombinant proteins remains a major bottleneck in biochemical and structural studies. We describe an aqueous, solvent-centric, fully miniaturized 96-well workflow to screen extraction conditions that preserve soluble recombinant protein during lysis and clarification in a single working day. Liquid-nitrogen-frozen E. coli pellets are cryogenically bead-milled with stainless-steel beads, retaining the native intracellular milieu while ensuring uniform disruption. The resulting wet, frozen cell powder can therefore be extracted with user-defined solvent, enabling systematic exploration of pH, ionic strength, detergents, and chaotropes. Protein solubility is assessed by a 1 µL chromogenic anti-His dot-blot. We demonstrate the use of the protocol by solubilizing a set of highly challenging de novo -generated proteins and show that dot-blot intensity provides a practical semi-quantitative proxy for successful extraction of soluble proteins. We also provide experimentally supported guidelines on the influence of solvent reagents on subsequent steps of protein production, SDS-PAGE, and Ni-NTA purification. This workflow is compatible with upstream genetic solubility-enhancement, chassis- and cultivation-based strategies and enables direct transition from screening hits to scale-up. Because the workflow uses standard molecular biology equipment and inexpensive consumables, it can be readily adopted or automated in most laboratories.

Article activity feed

  1. extraction buffers are dispensed

    what volume of extraction buffer do you use here? Information on the ratio of 'dried pellet material' to extraction buffer would be helpful here.

  2. dot-blot signal

    What are the advantages of the dot blot over a conventional sds-page analysis? SDS-PAGE likely takes the same amount of time as a dot blot, but potentially gives you more information about each sample.

  3. provided in

    This might just be an artifact of biorxiv, but I don't see a table description anywhere. What were the adverse reactions for the SDS-PAGE? Did the gel just not run straight or stain evenly? Also, what are the units for purification yield?

  4. d than optimized IPTG

    It makes sense that you use the auto-induction for more high throughput purposes. After finding an optimal condition and scaling up, would you recommend switching to IPTG? Would you expect any changes?