Cross-species comparative connectomics reveals the evolution of an olfactory circuit
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (Arcadia Science)
Abstract
Animal behavioural diversity ultimately stems from variation in neural circuitry, yet how central neural circuits evolve remains poorly understood. Studies of neural circuit evolution often focus on a few elements within a network. However, addressing fundamental questions in evolutionary neuroscience, such as whether some elements are more evolvable than others, requires a more global and unbiased approach. Here, we used synapse-level comparative connectomics to examine how an entire olfactory circuit evolves. We compared the full antennal lobe connectome of the larvae of two closely related Drosophila species, D. melanogaster and D. erecta , which differ in their ecological niches and odour-driven behaviours. We found that evolutionary change is unevenly distributed across the network. Some features, including neuron types, neuron numbers and interneuron-to-interneuron connectivity, are highly conserved. These conserved elements delineate a core circuit blueprint presumably required for fundamental olfactory processing. Superimposed on this scaffold, we find rewiring changes that mirror each species’ ecologies, including a systematic shift in the excitation-to-inhibition balance in the feedforward pathways. We further show that some neurons have changed more than others, and that even within individual neurons some synaptic elements remain conserved while others display major species-specific changes, suggesting evolutionary hot-spots within the circuit. Our findings reveal constrained and adaptable elements within olfactory networks, and establish a framework for identifying general principles in the evolution of neural circuits underlying behaviour.
Article activity feed
-
Remarkably, we uncover that not all circuit elements have evolved their connectivity to the same extent
I found this study interesting, but as someone outside this field, I'm curious why you were surprised by this result? It's generally true in evolution that constituent parts of organisms can evolve at different rates and in different ways than the whole organism, depending on selective pressures that affect some aspects of biology more than others. This is certainly true for genes, so I would have expected this to be true for circuit elements as well. However, it seems that you may have been surprised by this result? Can you help me understand what field-level assumptions or observations cause this result to be unexpected?
-