“ Why are you doing contraception? … They don’t need it in jail”. Service provider views on women’s access to contraception in Australian prisons
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Introduction
Women with a history of incarceration report higher rates of pregnancy, pregnancy terminations, and the use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) methods, alongside poorer birth outcomes compared to non-justice involved women, suggesting distinctive family planning needs. Despite this, little is known on how this is provided within carceral settings, or the structural barriers experiences by both staff and other service providers. In this article, we report findings from a qualitative study conducted with a sample of professionals working in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, who either provide healthcare services to women either during incarceration or in the immediate post-release period. Specifically, we describe structural factors that may impede or support access to the provision, insertion or removal of contraception devices.
Methods
We conducted semi-structured interviews with n=12 professionals, working in NSW, who either provide reproductive healthcare services to women during incarceration or in the immediate post-release period. Data was analysed thematically against the Vulnerable Populations Behaviour Model.
Results
Seven themes were identified relating to contraception service provision in prison. Participants observed specific patient characteristics which they believed were driving contraception needs including 1) a state of interrupted fertility caused by incarceration, and 2) post-release chaos which impeded access to appropriate family planning in the community. Areas of high need were characterised by 1) accessible, reversible and non-invasive contraception options, and 2) thoughtful counselling. Structural factors impeding contraception service access during incarceration included: 1) service priorities and staff biases negatively impacting access, 2) poor overall health service integration, and 3) inequitable funding models during incarceration. Consequently, incarcerated women do not have comparable access to contraception compared to women in the community.
Conclusion
The lack of focus on contraception services in prison represents a missed opportunity to support highly marginalised women who may also face challenges accessing such services upon release.
