Antimycotic Susceptibility of Environmental Airborne Yeasts: Evidence from Diverse Work Environments
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
This study compared the susceptibility of environmental yeast isolates from indoor and outdoor air collected at an electronics factory, an office, and a winery in Malaysia to various antifungal agents
Methods
Sabouraud’s Dextrose Agar (SDA) (supplemented with 0.05g/L Chloramphenicol to inhibit bacterial growth) and Dichloran Glycerol Agar ( DG-18) (for xerophilic yeasts) were used for the isolation of yeasts. Air sample volumes ranging from 10 to 250 litres were drawn using the Ideal Air Sampler (Biomerieux BBL) and impacted onto DG-18 and SDA plates. SDA plates and DG-18 plates were subsequently incubated at 25 ° C and 21 ° C respectively for four days after sampling. Fourteen isolates were randomly selected from each sampling point at each sampling event. Yeast colonies were identified using the commercial biochemical panel Integral Systems Yeast Plus (Liofilchem) after the second subculture from the primary isolation plate. The system also characterises susceptibility to the following antimycotic agents: nystatin, amphotericin, flucytosine, econazole, ketoconazole, clotrimoxazole, miconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole and fluconazole .
Results
A total of 196 yeast isolates from ten species were tested. Cryptococcus laurentii was the predominant species across all sites. Most isolates were susceptible to ketoconazole, fluconazole, flucytosine, itraconazole, and nystatin. Lower susceptibility was observed for amphotericin and econazole. Overall, 61.7% of isolates were fully susceptible to all tested agents.
Conclusions
The majority of environmental airborne yeasts demonstrated susceptibility to common antimycotics. The dominance of Cryptococcus laurentii and the variable susceptibility patterns underscore the need for continued environmental surveillance
