A systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of breast cancer-related lymphoedema due to treatment combinations
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
BACKGROUND
Breast cancer related-lymphoedema (BCRL) is a chronic, debilitating disease for which there is no cure. A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the association between different treatment combinations on the incidence of BCRL.
METHODS
The review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines with four databases searched for studies published from 2000-2020, including OVID Medline, OVID Embase, Cochrane Library for Registered Controlled Trials, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, yielding 2640 studies. A random effects model was used to determine BCRL incidence rates stratified by treatment types of the qualifying studies.
RESULTS
The pooled incidence rate was 23% (95% CI 20.8 – 25.4) for patients who received axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and 5.6% (95% CI 4.5 – 6.8) for patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). A higher level of intervention to the axilla was identified as the key factor associated with significantly increased BCRL incidence, including ALND (p<0.001), the number of lymph nodes removed (p<0.001), and axillary radiotherapy (p<0.001). Higher patient BMI was also identified to increase BCRL incidence. Combinations of other treatments, in conjunction with ALND or SLNB, did not lead to statistically significant differences in incidence. Furthermore, different diagnostic criteria resulted in substantial variation in BCRL incidence rates.
CONCLUSION
Axilla intervention was associated with increased BCRL incidence including ALND, number of lymph nodes removed, and radiotherapy. The inclusion of additional surgical or non-surgical treatments did not. This analysis re-emphasises the clear need for standardised reporting of patient treatments as well as universally applied diagnostic protocols.
