Concordance and dissonance: A genome-wide analysis of self-declared versus inferred ancestry in 10,250 participants from the HostSeq cohort

Accurate characterization of human diversity is foundational to equitable genomics. In this study, we analyzed self-declared and genome-derived ancestry in 10,250 participants from the pan-Canadian HostSeq cohort. Using the alignment-free ntRoot algorithm on whole genome sequencing data, we inferred global and local ancestry at the continental super-population level and compared these with self-reported sociocultural identity categories. We observed high concordance among individuals self-identifying as White (98.8%), Black (97.2%), East Asian (96.1%), and South Asian (89.9%). Concordance was lower among those self-identifying as Hispanic (74.6%), Middle Eastern / Central Asian (67.9%), or Indigenous (40.7%), reflecting greater admixture complexity. Agreement between expected and inferred ancestry labels was modest (Cohen’s kappa κ = −0.01 unweighted; 0.35 weighted), and ancestry discordance was strongly associated with higher Shannon entropy of ancestry fractions. Principal component analysis of ntRoot-derived ancestry composition revealed tightly clustered profiles in some groups and broader, overlapping distributions in others, illustrating how sociocultural identities and genomic data capture distinct but intersecting dimensions of human diversity. These findings support the complementary use of genome-derived continental ancestry fractions alongside self-identification, particularly in settings where sociocultural labels may be incomplete, heterogenous, or poorly aligned with genetic background. This approach can improve scientific rigor and enhance inclusion in population-scale genomics while respecting the social meaning of identity. We emphasize that genetic ancestry estimates are not proxies for race, which is a social construct with no biological basis.