A Pilot Study on Cost and Other Implementation Factors Comparing Telehealth and In-Person Therapy Service Delivery Following NICU Discharge

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Introduction

Innovative models are needed to improve access to early therapy for high-risk infants discharged from the NICU. This study aimed to 1) compare costs between in-person and telehealth early therapy, and 2) evaluate adoptability, feasibility, adaptations, and acceptability of each model.

Methods and Materials

Twenty high-risk NICU infants were enrolled before discharge and randomized to receive therapy via telehealth or in-person Baby Bridge programming until community-based services began. Weekly visits were scheduled, with flexibility for switching formats (telehealth or in-person) when agreed upon by the therapist and family. Cost, utilization, and adaptations were tracked. Parent satisfaction was assessed via a post-discharge questionnaire.

Results

One infant was withdrawn due to readmission prior to receiving Baby Bridge services. Completion rates were high (18/19, 95%). In-person sessions were significantly more expensive ($141.35 ± $51.10) than telehealth sessions ($46.29 ± $16.19; p<0.001). Telehealth sessions generated positive average net revenue ($61.45 ± $54.31), while in-person sessions incurred losses (-$44.96 ± $63.63; p<0.001). Medicaid-insured sessions incurred losses for both telehealth (-$10.36 ± 4.94) and in-person (-$85.56 ± 38.53), whereas privately insured sessions yielded positive net revenues for telehealth ($91.92 ± 32.35) and in-person ($5.78 ± 51.20) sessions. No group differences were found in time to first session or session frequency. Visit format adaptations occurred in both groups (17% of telehealth visits; 36% of in-person; p<0.03). Parent satisfaction was comparable across groups.

Conclusion

Telehealth therapy is significantly less costly and more financially sustainable than in-person therapy. Both delivery models were feasible, with high satisfaction reported by families. Flexibility in adapting visit format supports better access and uptake, especially within in-person models. Telehealth offers a promising alternative for early intervention in high-risk infants following NICU discharge.

Article activity feed