Part 1: Examining heterogeneity of treatment effects in transcranial direct current stimulation for knee osteoarthritis pain and symptoms
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
Although heterogeneity of treatment effects (HTE) is commonly observed in clinical trials, it has received little attention in studies on transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). This study aimed to identify the presence of HTE in tDCS treatment among participants with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and to explore participant characteristics associated with this heterogeneity.
Methods
This exploratory secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial included 120 participants with symptomatic KOA who received 15 daily sessions of home-based 2-mA active or sham tDCS (20 minutes per session) over three weeks. First, we used a multi-trajectory latent class growth analysis to identify distinct subgroups based on the longitudinal trajectories of KOA pain and symptoms from baseline to three months postintervention, capturing differential responses to tDCS. We then performed bivariate analyses to examine associations between trajectory groups and baseline demographic, clinical, and quantitative sensory testing characteristics.
Results
In the active tDCS group, two distinct trajectories emerged: “low initial symptoms with significant improvement” (high responders; n = 28) and “high initial symptoms with minimal improvement” (low responders; n = 32). Compared to high responders, low responders had a higher body mass index ( p = .040), lower educational attainment ( p = .013), and greater pain catastrophizing (p < .000). Low responders also exhibited lower pressure pain thresholds at both the medial knee ( p = .009) and trapezius ( p = .002), higher punctate mechanical pain at both the patella ( p = .013) and hand ( p = .016), lower conditioned pain modulation at 30 seconds ( p = .008) and 60 seconds ( p < .000), and higher cold pain intensity ( p = .003) at baseline. No notable HTE was observed in the sham tDCS group.
Conclusion
Participants exhibited varying responses to active tDCS. The characteristics associated with HTE may inform the development of personalized stimulation protocols. Further research is needed to investigate potential HTE in the sham tDCS group and refine strategies to address placebo-related effects.
