Bridging the gaps: Contextualizing the mhGAP Humanitarian Intervention Guide to implement in Pakistan
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
The mhGAP Humanitarian Intervention Guide (mhGAP-HIG) offers an evidence-based intervention to strengthen the capacity of non-specialists to manage mental, neurological, and substance use conditions in humanitarian contexts. The Ministry of Planning, Development and Special Initiatives (MoPD&SI) developed a Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS) service model for Pakistan in 2021. As part of the model, this study identified implementation gaps and described the process of contextualizing mhGAP-HIG to address them.
Methods
We explored the implementation gaps through a three-step process, including a desk review, a focus group discussion, and four key informant interviews with relevant stakeholders. A thematic analysis using the framework method was applied. We followed the World Health Organization’s recommended process for contextualization and conducted an adaptation workshop. This was followed by a comprehensive review of the guide with reference to the country’s healthcare context and clinical practices, and a Delphi consensus achieving 90% success. We field tested the contextualized guide with training of trainers; and training of primary healthcare workers using pre- and post- knowledge assessment, analyzed via paired t-test.
Results
We identified four implementation gaps: knowledge, skills and attitude, knowledge-to-practice, training resource, and supervision gaps. While contextualizing, these gaps were addressed by incorporating additional knowledge; cultural constructs; instructions for interview, examination and interventions; and translating these instructions into Urdu language. To address the training resource gaps, the MoPD&SI published the adapted guide as a national resource; and developed a mobile application that serves as a complete reference and provides integrated features for remote supervision. The field testing of the adapted guide demonstrated its educational effectiveness, relevance, user-friendliness, and feasibility for implementation.
Conclusions
This study presents a systematic contextualization and field-testing of mhGAP-HIG. It demonstrates that successful contextualization requires a culturally grounded, system-aware, and stakeholder-informed approach. We recommend integrating the guide into pre-service training and ensure policy support for integration into primary care for long-term outcomes.
