Bridging the gaps: Contextualizing the mhGAP Humanitarian Intervention Guide to implement in Pakistan
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
The mhGAP Humanitarian Intervention Guide (mhGAP-HIG) offers an evidence-based intervention to strengthen the capacity of non-specialists to manage mental, neurological, and substance use conditions in humanitarian contexts. The Ministry of Planning, Development and Special Initiatives (MoPD&SI) developed a Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS) service model for Pakistan in 2021. As part of the model, this study identified implementation gaps and described the process of contextualizing mhGAP-HIG to address them.
Methods
We explored the implementation gaps through a three-step process, including a desk review, a focus group discussion, and four key informant interviews with relevant stakeholders. A thematic analysis using the framework method was applied. We followed the World Health Organization’s recommended process for contextualization and conducted an adaptation workshop. This was followed by a comprehensive review of the guide with reference to the country’s healthcare context and clinical practices, and a Delphi consensus achieving 90% success. We field tested the contextualized guide with training of trainers; and training of primary healthcare workers using pre- and post- knowledge assessment, analyzed via paired t-test.
Results
We identified four implementation gaps: knowledge, skills and attitude, knowledge-to-practice, training resource, and supervision gaps. While contextualizing, these gaps were addressed by incorporating additional knowledge; cultural constructs; instructions for interview, examination and interventions; and translating these instructions into Urdu language. To address the training resource gaps, the MoPD&SI published the adapted guide as a national resource; and developed a mobile application that serves as a complete reference and provides integrated features for remote supervision. The field testing of the adapted guide demonstrated its educational effectiveness, relevance, user-friendliness, and feasibility for implementation.
Conclusions
This study presents a systematic contextualization and field-testing of mhGAP-HIG. It demonstrates that successful contextualization requires a culturally grounded, system-aware, and stakeholder-informed approach. We recommend integrating the guide into pre-service training and ensure policy support for integration into primary care for long-term outcomes.
