Adolescent cannabinoid vapour exposure sex-dependently alters the relationship between vulnerability traits and ethanol self-administration and modifies naltrexone actions on ethanol intake in rats
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
Cannabis use during adolescence is common and may predispose individuals to substance use disorders. Animal studies have explored the gateway hypothesis, but data on ethanol consumption are limited. This study aimed to investigate the potential link between adolescent cannabis exposure and ethanol self-administration, as well as the relationship between predisposing behavioural traits and ethanol consumption.
Methods
Adolescent rats were exposed to vapourised Δ 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) alone or with cannabidiol (CBD) at different ratios, or to a vehicle, from postnatal day (PND) 28 to 44, every other day. Behavioural assessments, including novelty and saccharin preference, goal-tracking, elevated plus maze, and ethanol self-administration (fixed and progressive ratio, punished seeking), were conducted from PND 70. Naltrexone was administered to assess its effects on ethanol intake.
Results
Cannabinoid exposure did not significantly affect behavioural traits or ethanol self-administration. However, sex differences emerged, with females showing a more vulnerable pattern of ethanol consumption and seeking. In THC-exposed males, a negative correlation was observed between sucrose preference and compulsive ethanol seeking, which was absent in vehicle-exposed males. In females, THC exposure disrupted the correlation between novelty preference and ethanol intake and was associated with a negative correlation between goal-tracking and compulsive seeking. Naltrexone was most effective in reducing ethanol intake in THC-exposed rats.
Conclusions
Adolescent cannabinoid exposure has limited effects on overall alcohol risk but may alter the psychological framework of alcohol-related behaviours and increase naltrexone potency. The observed sex differences highlight the need for personalised interventions.
