Charred or Fragmented, Yet Comparable: Quantifying Dental Surface Similarity Across Teeth, Jaws, and Heat Exposure

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Accurate dental matching is essential for forensic identification, particularly in challenging cases involving dentitions with no dental work, incomplete dentitions or damaged remains. This study evaluates similarity scoring schemes for 3D dental data using three datasets: full jaws versus single teeth (DATA-A), and two collections of heat-traumatized teeth (DATA-B and DATA-C). The similarity scores are assessed for their ability to quantify curvature similarity and distinguish matching from mismatching dental comparisons. Results demonstrate the method’s effectiveness in handling dental fragmentation (ROC-AUC DATA-A = 0.899 (95% CI 0.840 to 0.948) and heat trauma (ROC-AUC DATA-B = 0.996 (95% CI 0.98 to 1.00); ROC-AUC DATA-C = 0.993 (95% CI 0.980 to 1.00), offering a robust tool for forensic applications.

Highlights

  • Tests the keypoint pipeline on two different trauma scenarios

  • Quantifies dental surface similarity between single teeth and full jaws

  • Quantifies dental surface similarity before and after heat exposure

  • Underlining the usefulness of the keypoint pipeline for trauma scenarios

  • Article activity feed