Enhanced Predictive Accuracy of the Revised Risk Analysis Index Over the 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index for Postoperative Outcomes in Olecranon Fractures
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Objective
To compare the predictive accuracy of the Risk Analysis Index (RAI) versus the 5-factor Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) for postoperative outcomes in olecranon fracture open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).
Methods
This retrospective study analyzed 3,987 patients from the ACS-NSQIP database who underwent olecranon ORIF between 2015-2020. Outcomes included 30-day mortality, non-home discharge (NHD), complications, readmission, and extended length of stay. Predictive accuracy was assessed using area under ROC curves (AUROC).
Results
RAI demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for NHD (AUROC: 0.81 vs 0.68, p<0.001), major complications (AUROC: 0.72 vs 0.65, p=0.05), and reoperation (AUROC: 0.63 vs 0.57, p=0.03) compared to mFI-5. Severely frail patients identified by RAI showed significantly increased odds for NHD (OR: 4.78, p=0.005), extended length of stay (OR: 2.83, p=0.008), and major complications (OR: 9.23, p=0.03). No significant differences were found between indices for mortality, minor complications, or readmission rates.
Conclusion
The RAI demonstrates superior discriminatory accuracy compared to mFI-5 for predicting adverse outcomes after olecranon ORIF, particularly for NHD and major complications. Implementation of RAI in preoperative assessment may improve risk stratification and resource allocation for olecranon fracture patients.
