The NPIS Model: A Standardized, Consensus-Based Framework for Evaluating Non-Pharmacological Interventions

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background

The term non-pharmacological intervention (NPI) refers to health prevention and care protocols supervised by healthcare professionals. However, no precise and widely adopted definition currently exists. Additionally, unlike drugs, NPIs lack a global evaluation framework due to the absence of consensus among stakeholders, driven by the heterogeneity of intervention content and study protocols. This heterogeneity limits scientific impact, hinders dissemination and continuous improvement of practices, and contributes to significant mistrust among professionals and users.

Method

From 2022 to 2023, we conducted a consensus study, collaborating with over 1,000 stakeholders—including researchers, healthcare users, healthcare practitioners, health operators, scientific societies and health authorities—to co-construct a NPI definition along with a framework for evaluating NPIs that aligns with their specific characteristics and international health research standards. This framework—the NPIS Model—was developed under the guidance of a multidisciplinary committee of 22 experts through iterative, open, and documented exchanges across four stages: i) creation of an initial list of ethical and methodological items by a committee of 70 members, ii) refinement of this list by a committee of 300 members, iii) open voting on each item by 503 voters, and iv) consultation with 36 scientific societies and 14 health authorities.

Findings

We reached a consensus defining an NPI as an “evidence-based, effective, personalized, non-invasive health prevention or care protocol, registered and supervised by a qualified professional” . Based on this definition, we developed the NPIS Model, which includes 77 recommendations for evaluating NPIs—14 ethical and 63 methodological. Each recommendation received at least 80% agreement among voters. The recommendation are categorized into five types of studies: mechanistic, observational, prototypical, intervention, and implementation. To date, the NPIS Model has been endorsed by 31 scientific societies and three health authorities.

Interpretation

The NPIS Model promotes transparency, methodological rigor, ethical standards, and transferability for NPI research, increasing the value of NPIs for researchers, healthcare practitioners, healthcare users, and health authorities.

Funding

National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) “ Fonds d’amorçage recherche participative” .

Research in context

Evidence before this study

Publications on non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) are rapidly increasing. We performed a MEDLINE (Pubmed) search on June 16, 2023, using the following request on all fields: “non-pharmacologic” OR “nonpharmacologic” OR “non-pharmacological” OR “nonpharmacological” OR “non-pharmaceutical” OR “nonpharmaceutical” OR “non-medication” OR “non-drug” OR “nondrug”. This search identified 33,387 articles, with a fourfold increase in publications over the past decade.

Despite this growth, no consensus-based framework exists for conducting NPI research. Alongside our PubMed search, we reviewed all guidelines in the EQUATOR network. Although some guidelines cover specific aspects of NPI studies, we found no consensus-based evaluation framework tailored specifically to NPIs.

Added value of this study

We co-constructed an NPI definition along with a framework—the NPIS Model—in a consensus study involving over 1,000 stakeholders, including researchers, healthcare users, healthcare practitioners, health operators, scientific societies and health authorities. Extensive stakeholder engagement has shaped the NPIS Model to reflect a broad range of perspectives, ensuring its relevance and acceptance. The NPIS Model contains 14 ethical items and 63 methodological items, each achieving over 80% agreement. It has received support from 31 scientific societies and three health authorities, which underlines its relevance across health sectors.

Implications of all the available evidence

A consensus-based evaluation framework for NPIs will significantly enhance the quality of NPI research by improving consistency, reproducibility, and comparability. The NPIS Model promotes methodological rigor, ethical standards, and research transferability. Ultimately, we expect this model to benefit researchers, healthcare practitioners and users, and inform public health policies.

Article activity feed