Temporal Trends in Utilization of Transvenous Lead Extractions among Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections: Analyses of the Nationwide Japanese Registry of All Cardiac and Vascular Diseases-Diagnostic Procedure Combination data

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background

Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are a growing concern, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. International guidelines recommend a complete device and lead extraction for infected cases, yet real-world adherence to these recommendations remains suboptimal. The utilization of transvenous lead extractions (TLEs) in Japan has not been well characterized.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective observational study using the Japanese Registry of All Cardiac and Vascular Diseases diagnosis procedure combination/per diem payment system (JROAD-DPC) from 2015 to 2021. Patients diagnosed with CIED infections were identified based on the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision codes. This study aimed to investigate the real-world utilization of TLEs in CIED infections, assess the trends over time, and identify the factors associated with the likelihood of undergoing a TLE and the procedural complications.

Results

Among 7,434 hospitalization records, only 38% underwent TLEs for CIED infections in the overall hospitals. However, the utilization of TLEs in certified TLE hospitals increased significantly from 54.0% in 2015 to 70.8% in 2021 (p-trend < 0.001). Independent predictors of reduced TLEs included a lower BMI, female sex, cerebrovascular disease, and dementia. Notably, 65.5% of patients in non-certified hospitals were discharged home, suggesting potential undertreatment.

Conclusions

While the TLE rate is increasing, a considerable proportion of patients with CIED infections do not undergo TLEs. Addressing barriers through physician education, improved referral systems, and adherence to guideline-directed management, especially in non-certified hospitals, is essential for optimizing the TLE rate.

Clinical Perspectives

What Is New?

  • This study was the first nationwide, population-based analysis to evaluate the actual rate and trends of transvenous lead extractions (TLEs) for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections in Japan.

  • By rigorously identifying clinically indicated cases based on the current guidelines, it revealed a marked increase in TLE implementation, particularly in certified hospitals, and also highlighted a substantial undertreatment in non-certified centers.

What Are the Clinical Implications?

  • Despite increasing TLE rates, especially in certified hospitals, a significant proportion of patients with clinically indicated CIED infections do not undergo lead extractions.

  • Identifying the predictors of undertreatment and reinforcing education and referral pathways in non-certified hospitals are essential steps to ensure a timely and appropriate guideline-directed management.

Article activity feed