Understudied anophelines may sustain residual transmission during the dry season in a pre-elimination setting in southern Zambia

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Malaria control is a public health priority but common control methods like indoor residual spraying and the use of bednets do not target outdoor-biting vectors. In settings with seasonal residual malaria transmission, we lack critical knowledge regarding anopheline species composition and their role in transmission. This study aimed to determine relative seasonal vector species abundance and associated household level factors in a low transmission setting in Choma District, Zambia. Indoor and outdoor adult vector collections were embedded in a community-based longitudinal cohort study in 60 households that were visited monthly for 2 years between 2018 and 2020. Surveys conducted at the time of trap placement collected information on animal ownership, housing structure, and the receipt of malaria interventions. Anopheline species identities were molecularly confirmed by polymerase chain reaction, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to detect the circumsporozoite protein of Plasmodium falciparum . Generalized linear mixed effects negative binomial regression with zero-inflation models were used to describe the relationship between risk factors and the outcome of monthly anopheline counts at each household, stratified by season. The study collected 1,532 female anophelines, 76% of which were caught outdoors. The relative abundance differed by season: in the dry season, 90% of female anophelines were caught outdoors. Anopheles arabiensis was overall the most common vector, but made up only 28% of outdoor collections; the remainder were understudied anophelines including An. coustani , An. leesoni , An. rufipes , and An. squamosus. The only Plasmodium falciparum -infected mosquito was an An. squamosus that was caught outdoors. Owning more goats was associated with a 3.5 (IRR 4.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.00, 10.01) and 7.7 (IRR 8.73, 95% CI: 4.40, 17.32) times increase in indoor and outdoor anopheline collections in the dry season and a 1.2 (IRR 2.18, 95% CI: 1.12, 4.23) times higher risk of outdoor anophelines in the rainy season. Improved housing structure was associated with fewer indoor anophelines in the rainy season, but not during dry season or outdoor anopheline abundance any time of year. Vector control in this low transmission setting, therefore, needs to target anopheline mosquitoes year-round, must be expanded to target traditionally zoophillic mosquitoes, and leverage known risk factors when selecting methods of control.

Article activity feed