Supermarket fruit and vegetable placement trial: outcomes on store sales, customer purchasing, diet and household waste in a prospective matched-controlled cluster study

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background

Previous product placement trials have been underpowered and limited in outcomes. This study assessed effects of positioning an expanded fruit and vegetable section near entrances on store-level sales, household-level purchasing and waste, and dietary behaviours.

Methods

This prospective matched controlled cluster trial (NIHR 17/44/46) involved 36 stores (18 intervention and 18 control) of a discount supermarket chain in England. The intervention was implemented for six months. Control stores were matched on store sales, customer profiles and neighbourhood deprivation. Women customers aged 18 to 60 years, with loyalty cards, were assigned to the intervention (n=280) or control group (n=300).

Results

Interrupted time series analyses showed increases in store-level sales of fruit and vegetables were greater in intervention stores than predicted at intervention implementation (0.32SDs (95%CI 0.11, 0.53), p=0.002) and 3-months (0.23SDs (95%CI −0.05, 0.52), p=0.10) and 6-months follow-up (0.18SDs (−0.16, 0.52), p=0.29), equivalent to ∼2525 (95% CI 775, 4115), 1940 (95% CI 380, 3950) and 1450 (95% CI −945, 3950) extra portions per store, per week respectively. Effect sizes were somewhat stronger in stores where the produce section moved forward further. Proportion of households purchasing fruit and vegetables were somewhat protected among intervention compared to control participants. Changes in dietary quality were small but generally in the direction for health benefit. Change in frequency of household vegetable waste was negligible at 3-month follow-up but increased at 6-months.

Interpretation

Positioning produce sections near supermarket entrances can improve the nutrition profile of store sales and may improve household purchasing and dietary quality.

Trial registration

NCT03573973.

Research in Context

Evidence before this study

  • Obesity and poor diet are major public health concerns and retailers’ marketing strategies impact food choices

  • Product placement is a marketing strategy used by many retailers to promote unhealthy foods

  • Governments are beginning to ban the placement of unhealthy foods at locations such as store entrances, checkouts and aisle ends in large retailers, in-store and online

Added value of this study

  • Research from adequately powered, robustly designed real-world studies on the prominent placement of healthy foods can inform improvements to existing regulations to maximise their impact on population diet

  • Positioning an expanded fruit and vegetable section near store entrances increased fresh and vegetable sales at the population level; this intervention may protect against declines in household produce purchasing, particularly when exposed to a greater intervention dose

Implications of all the available evidence

  • Government regulations to curb placement marketing strategies being used by retailers to promote unhealthy foods should consider requiring the placement of a fruit and vegetables section at store entrances alongside limiting placement of unhealthy foods in locations such as checkouts, aisle-ends and store entrances to maximise their health

Article activity feed