An extensive and unbiased genome-wide scan for parent-of-origin expressed genes in the pig clarifies the conservation landscape of genomic imprinting
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Genomic imprinting, a mechanism resulting in parent-of-origin expression of genes through epigenetic regulation, intersects with a broad range of biological fields including evolution, molecular genetics and epigenetics and determinism of complex traits. Although next generation sequencing technologies enable nowadays to detect imprinted genes in a genome-wide manner, a wide spectrum of this phenomena is evaluated only in humans and mice.
Here, we propose to map genes showing a parental expression bias in hypothalamus, muscle and placenta in piglets around birth using an extensive and unbiased strategy that relied on reciprocal crosses, genetics reconstruction of parental phases after imputation and statistical analyses discriminating parent-of-origin from allele-specific expression. We detected 440 unique genes with a weak to exclusive parental expression bias including 114 unique genes with an imbalance ratio above 25:75. About thirty imprinted genes are common to human and/or mice and an equivalent number is shared between tissues, suggesting an overall weak conservation landscape of genomic imprinting. Interestingly, we identified novel parent-of-origin expressed genes involved in neurodevelopmental ( PITRM1 , Pitrilysin Metallopeptidase 1) and fetal growth ( FAM20B , Glycosaminoglycan Xylosylkinase and POU6F2 , POU Class 6 Homeobox 2) functions. In addition, deeper analyses of specific loci likely highlighted lineage-specific imprinted genes such as a Zinc Finger Protein 300-like gene as well as specific imprinted isoforms of COPG2 (COPI Coat Complex Subunit Gamma 2), a gene showing conflicting data in the literature.
Altogether, our results bring pig as the most comprehensively and exhaustively documented species for genomic imprinting after human and mice organisms. A weak conservation of this mechanism across species and tissues suggested a distinction between a small number of core imprinted genes and others parent-of-origin expressed genes that seemed subjected to evolutionary forces for acquiring their imprinting status either in a lineage-specific or tissue-specific manner.