Free-living food intake and repopulation of the gut microbiota after a health-screening colonoscopy
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Objective
Role of microbiome has been highly studied for its association with various medical conditions. After a colonoscopy, repopulation of colonic microbial load is known to occur, however the quality and timing of natural repopulation has not been investigated after a bowel preparation. Further, no study has documented detailed free-living dietary intakes concurrently with gut microbiome repopulation post-colonoscopy. Here we sought to determine the early pattern of repopulation relative to dietary intake.
Methods
Healthy adults (n=15 [4 female/11 male], BMI=27.2±3.9 kg/m 2 , age 51.4±7.2 y) who were scheduled to undergo a screening colonoscopy were recruited from the Gastroenterology Clinic at the University of Missouri. Within two weeks before the colonoscopy (baseline), subjects completed detailed food records for 3 days. Post-colonoscopy, subjects ate their free-living diets and detailed food records were collected on Days 0, 1, 2, 4, 7, 10, and 13. Fecal samples were obtained pre-colonoscopy and on post-colonoscopy Days 3, 5, 8, 11, and 14. Gut microbiome composition was assessed by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing.
Results
Within 5 days after the procedure, subjects reported consuming more total daily energy relative to baseline, presumably to make up for the low energy intake that occurred during the bowel-prep. At baseline, fiber intake (21.0±9.1 g/d) was higher than on the day of the colonoscopy, Day 0 (16.1±11.2, P =0.0159). Thereafter, daily fiber intake was the same as baseline. Marked intersubject microbiome beta diversity was observed by principal coordinate analysis using weighted and unweighted dissimilarities ( P =0.0001, F=15.23, one-way PERMANOVA). Select taxa were depleted acutely post-colonoscopy (e.g., within the phylum Bacillota). Specifically, significant effects of time were observed between baseline and Day 3 fecal samples (pairwise P =0.0013, F=2.9). These changes trended to return to baseline by Day 5 and with subsequent samples, taxa remained similar to baseline when tested using a weighted dissimilarity analysis (Bray-Curtis).
Conclusions
These results quantitatively demonstrate the magnitude of the significant changes in microbial relative abundance and diversity immediately post-colonoscopy. The timing of repopulation aligned with changes in fiber intake after the procedure. These data highlight the importance of nutrition after a screening colonoscopy in reestablishing a healthy microbiome.
