High agreement between lean mass assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis across the adult lifespan

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background

Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is considered a portable alternative to Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) when assessing deficient muscle mass, a major concern for older adults associated with increased risks of falls, fractures, disability, and mortality. However, several studies have demonstrated that BIA overestimates muscle mass in the older population and that estimates of muscle mass may depend on the BIA and DXA devices utilized. This study aims to describe the concordance between lean mass assessed by DXA and BIA across the adult population.

Methods

This study is based on data from the Copenhagen Sarcopenia Study, a cross-sectional study of 1127 healthy participants aged 22-92 years with complete measurements of lean mass from both DXA (iDXA, GE Lunar) and BIA (Inbody 770). Relative appendicular lean mass (ALM) was calculated by normalizing ALM to height 2 to account for allometric differences in body size.

Results

For the total cohort, linear regression models showed a strong correlation between BIA and DXA for ALM (R 2 = 0.92) and relative ALM (R 2 = 0.83). A small, yet consistent, bias of relative ALM values was observed where BIA measures were on average 0.25±0.50 kg/m 2 higher compared to measurements by DXA. The bias was consistent across age groups with a mean difference in relative ALM of 0.24±0.50 kg/m 2 , and 0.26±0.49 kg/m 2 for younger participants, and older participants, respectively.

Conclusion

BIA is a reliable alternative to DXA for assessing muscle mass, in both younger, and older adults. The findings indicate that with simple correction models for ALM and relative ALM, BIA can be a practical and accessible tool in clinical settings where DXA is unavailable. These models make BIA particularly useful for diagnosing sarcopenia, allowing for early detection and management regardless of age.

Key messages

Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is considered a portable alternative to Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) when assessing deficient muscle mass, a major concern for older adults and is associated with increased risks of falls, fractures, disability, and mortality. However, several studies have demonstrated that BIA overestimates muscle mass in the older population and estimates of muscle mass may depend on the BIA and DXA devices utilized. By applying the models of regression equations developed in this study, clinicians can improve the accuracy of BIA measurements, making BIA a practical alternative to DXA in clinical settings where DXA is not accessible. These findings are especially relevant for the early detection and management of sarcopenia in older adults, allowing for timely interventions to preserve muscle function and reduce the risk of adverse health outcomes.

Article activity feed