Benchmarking Long-read Sequencing Tools for Chromosome End-specific Telomere Analysis
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
- Evaluated articles (PREreview)
Abstract
Measuring chromosome end-specific telomeres is of great importance and could help elucidate better treatment algorithms and aid in a better understanding of cancer, aging, cardiovascular disease, and neurodegenerative diseases. In this study, we present a comparison of two cutting edge long-read sequencing telomere length analysis tools, TECAT and Telogator. We perform a comprehensive bench-marking of these two tools using Telseq as the standard. Our analysis included evaluating these tools on sensitivity, accuracy, and computational efficiency using a diverse data set of 9 samples from the 1000 Genomes Project which have matched long-read and short-read sequencing data. We found that while Teloga-tor demonstrated superior sensitivity, identifying on average 31% more telomeric reads across all samples, TECAT showed better accuracy with measurements more closely aligned with established literature values and Telseq benchmarks (R² = 0.74 vs 0.37), and TECAT displayed better computational efficiency, com-pleting tasks approximately 41% faster. Both tools successfully mapped telomere lengths to individual chromosome arms, demonstrating unprecedented resolution for telomere length analysis. Our results provide crucial insights for researchers selecting tools for telomere length analysis and highlight the current capabilities and limitations of computational approaches in telomere biology.
Article activity feed
-
This Zenodo record is a permanently preserved version of a PREreview. You can view the complete PREreview at https://prereview.org/reviews/15099397.
This manuscript addresses a critical challenge in telomere biology—accurate measurement of chromosome end-specific telomere lengths. While existing methods like qPCR and TRF provide overall or average telomere lengths, they cannot resolve telomere lengths on individual chromosome arms. Advances in long-read sequencing now enable the direct measurement of these end-specific lengths. In particular, the authors compare two specialized computational tools, TECAT and Telogator, against the more established short-read tool Telseq. Their study design includes multiple samples from the 1000 Genomes Project, each with both short-read and long-read data, thereby enabling a robust assessment.
Strengths…
This Zenodo record is a permanently preserved version of a PREreview. You can view the complete PREreview at https://prereview.org/reviews/15099397.
This manuscript addresses a critical challenge in telomere biology—accurate measurement of chromosome end-specific telomere lengths. While existing methods like qPCR and TRF provide overall or average telomere lengths, they cannot resolve telomere lengths on individual chromosome arms. Advances in long-read sequencing now enable the direct measurement of these end-specific lengths. In particular, the authors compare two specialized computational tools, TECAT and Telogator, against the more established short-read tool Telseq. Their study design includes multiple samples from the 1000 Genomes Project, each with both short-read and long-read data, thereby enabling a robust assessment.
Strengths and Significance
Comprehensive Benchmarking
The study goes beyond mere performance metrics on a single dataset by testing multiple human samples. This strategy underpins the conclusions with greater robustness. The assessment covers sensitivity, accuracy, and throughput/cost.
Chromosome Arm Resolution
Both TECAT and Telogator successfully map telomere lengths to individual chromosome ends. This level of resolution is a considerable advance over older methods that typically yield a single "average" telomere length per sample. By providing a more granular view, these tools open new avenues for studying telomere biology and its implications in processes such as aging and cancer.
Clear Performance Differences
Sensitivity: Telogator detects a higher number of telomeric reads, suggesting it is more inclusive in identifying telomeric sequences.
Accuracy: TECAT shows better agreement with Telseq (the short-read benchmark) and literature values for average telomere lengths, thus appearing more precise when matching published ranges.
Computational Efficiency: TECAT processes data faster overall, making it potentially more practical for very large datasets.
Future Applications
Access to end-specific telomere measurements can illuminate telomere dynamics with unprecedented detail. Clinical and basic research—particularly in fields like oncology, gerontology, and cardiology—may benefit substantially. The authors note that neither tool requires special adaptations to sample preparation, which makes retrospective application to existing long-read datasets straightforward.
Points for Consideration
Sources of Discrepancy
The paper mentions negative telomere length values reported by Telogator, suggesting potential issues in either thresholding or read-mapping parameters. Future iterations might address these artifacts explicitly.
Biological Context
The discussion briefly references diseases and aging, but stronger integration of how these findings may inform or advance clinical questions would enhance the paper's appeal to a broader audience. Since telomere dynamics play roles in numerous conditions, the authors could highlight how these tools could be best leveraged in translational or clinical studies.
Standardization and Validation
Although short-read tools like Telseq serve as benchmarks, further validation (e.g., correlating computational outputs with experimental methods like TRF or single-molecule telomere assays) would support broader acceptance of end-specific tools. Such cross-validation steps could help the community converge on standardized protocols.
Data Limitations
While the 1000 Genomes Project is an excellent resource, its samples often lack detailed phenotype or health-status information, limiting clinical correlations. Nonetheless, establishing these tools' accuracy at this stage is a logical first step before exploring deeper clinical relevance.
Conclusion
This article provides a valuable assessment of two cutting-edge tools for telomere length analysis, clarifying their strengths and limitations. The study's methodology is sound and the findings are highly relevant to the broader field of telomere biology, where precise measurements of individual chromosome ends are increasingly important. The authors' comparison with existing benchmarks adds credibility, and the demonstration of chromosome arm–level resolution underscores the potential for significant research and clinical impact.
Overall, the paper will be of interest to scientists studying telomeres, aging, and genome stability. By focusing on both performance and ease of use, the authors have generated insights that should guide researchers in selecting the appropriate tool for their specific long-read sequencing projects.
Competing interests
The author declares that they have no competing interests.
-
