Quantifying potential immortal time bias in observational studies in acute severe infection
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Immortal time bias exaggerates estimates of treatment efficacy in naïve analyses of observational data. We developed a tool to estimate the extent of this bias. The benefits of giving intravenous immunoglobulin in streptococcal toxic shock syndrome have likely been overstated
Background
Immortal time bias is a spurious or exaggerated protective association that commonly arises in naive analyses of observational data. It occurs when people receive the intervention because they survive, rather than survive because they received the intervention. Studies in conditions with substantial early mortality, such as acute severe infections, are particularly vulnerable. The bias can be avoided by fitting the intervention as a time-varying exposure.
Methods
We developed IMMORTOOL, an R package accessible via a user-friendly web interface. This tool will estimate the potential for immortal time bias using empiric or assumed data on the distributions of time to intervention and time to event. Assumptions are that no other biases are present and that the intervention does not impact the outcome. The tool was benchmarked using studies presenting both naive analyses and analyses with the intervention fit as a time-varying exposure. We applied IMMORTOOL to a set of influential observational studies that used naive analyses when estimating the impact of polyclonal intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) on survival in streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS).
Results
IMMORTOOL demonstrated that published estimates suggesting a survival advantage from giving IVIG in STSS are explained, at least in part, by immortal time bias.
Conclusions
IMMORTOOL can quantify the potential for immortal time bias in observational analyses. This may help readers interrogate published studies. We do not advocate IMMORTOOL being used to justify naive analyses where the intervention could be fit as a time-varying exposure. To what extent giving IVIG in STSS improves survival remains uncertain.