Functional Equivalence of the Proneural Genes Neurog1 and Neurog2 in the Developing Dorsal Root Ganglia Highlights the Importance of Timing of Neurogenesis in Biasing Somatosensory Precursor Fates

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Distinct subfamilies of proneural bHLH transcription factors (TFs) control neurogenesis and influence neuronal fate specification throughout the developing nervous system. While members of different subfamilies generally display divergent expression and functions, those within the same subfamily are often co-expressed, raising questions about their respective roles. Here, we assess the functional equivalence of the two paralogous proneural TFs Neurog1 and Neurog2, focusing on neurons of the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) which underlie our ability to process somatosensory information. During development, distinct classes of DRG neurons -classified as mechano/proprioceptors or thermo/nociceptors-are generated during two successive neurogenic phases, which are respectively controlled by Neurog2 and Neurog1, in line with their dynamic and complementary spatiotemporal expression patterns. Therefore, in this system, each TF appears to play unique roles in regulating neurogenesis and specifying distinct neuronal identities. Yet, using a gene replacement strategy in vivo , we show that, despite subtle divergences masked by dose-compensation effects, Neurog1 and Neurog2 are essentially functionally interchangeable in all aspects of DRG development, indicating that their apparent functional discrepancies primarily stem from divergent evolution of their gene regulatory regions, rather than of their respective biochemical properties. Notably, we definitively establish that neither TF directly specifies specific somatosensory neuron identities. This result, combined with : (i) a new series of birth-dating experiments supporting that most mechano/proprioceptive and thermo/nociceptive subtypes are predominantly born during successive time-windows; and (ii) analyses of complementary transgenic mouse models in which opposite temporal shifts of neurogenesis -either delayed onset or premature arrest-have predictable opposite impacts on their DRG content, highlight that the fate choice of somatosensory precursors toward the mechano/proprioceptive or thermo/nociceptive lineages critically depends on the timing of their birth.

Article activity feed