Measurement and interpretation of the Harare HIV combination prevention cascade in priority populations: A population survey of adolescent girls and young women and young men in Zimbabwe
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Introduction
HIV-negative adolescent girls and young women (AGYW), and male partners, have disproportionately high HIV incidence in many African countries. We used a new HIV Prevention Cascade (HPC) approach to quantify levels of, and barriers to, prevention method use to guide interventions to increase effective uptake of primary HIV prevention.
Methods
Data from the Manicaland HPC pilot study (2018-19; N=9803) in Zimbabwe were used to measure levels of sexual risk behaviour and construct HPCs for male condom, PrEP (females), VMMC (males) and combination prevention use by HIV-negative sexually-active AGYW (15-24-years) and male partners (15-29-years).
Results
19% of AGYW (N=1140) and 37% of young men (N=955) who had started sex reported one or more HIV risk behaviour and met the definition of the priority populations for HIV prevention. Of these, 63% of females and 87% of males were motivated to use an HIV prevention method, 28% and 63% had access to a method, and 16% and 53% used a method. Male condoms were the most commonly used prevention method, accounting for 97% of use in females and 55% in males. Barriers to motivation, access and capacity to use were reported for all priority populations and methods. Some barriers were common across HPCs (e.g. lack of risk perception, social unacceptability, and lack of acceptable provision); others were specific to particular prevention methods or priority populations (e.g. lack of availability).
Conclusion
HIV risk behaviours were commonly reported, but use of prevention methods is low in young people in Manicaland. Population survey measurements of HPCs revealed large gaps in all steps in the cascade (lack of motivation, lack of access and lack of capacity to use prevention) but also provided information on the reasons for these gaps that can aid in designing interventions that reduce new infections.
