Toxicity and Biodegradation of Two Different Hydrothermal Liquefaction Process Waters to Anaerobic Digestion and the Effect of Microaeration

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) can convert a considerable portion of the carbon in complex feedstocks into renewable bio-oil, but it also generates a liquid byproduct ( i.e. , HTL process water) that retains 15 – 55% of the carbon from the HTL feedstock. Feeding HTL process water to anaerobic digestion (AD) is a promising approach for maximizing resource recovery, enabling the conversion of the retained carbon into biogas. However, various toxic and poorly biodegradable compounds in HTL process water make its treatment with AD challenging. Presently, the underlying mechanisms remain often unclear. We investigated the impact of HTL process water from two different feedstocks – a food-waste proxy ( i.e. , dog food, rich in proteins) and wheat straw (rich in lignocellulose) – on the different trophic groups in the food web of AD. We found that methanogens rather than acidogens were inhibited by HTL process water. Comparative toxicity and biodegradability analyses showed that wheat-straw process water had a higher biodegradability regardless of its higher toxicity to acetoclastic methanogens than food-waste process water, due to its higher content in toxic but easily degradable aromatic compounds. Microaeration enhanced the biodegradation and methane yields of food-waste process water, particularly under anoxic conditions. However, microaeration was ineffective for wheat-straw process water. These findings highlight the importance of feedstock-specific strategies to optimize AD for biogas production from HTL process water.

Article activity feed