A systematic review and meta-synthesis of factors that influence clinical decision making for organ support interventions within the critical care unit
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
The critical care unit is a dynamic environment that necessitates a high volume of daily clinical decisions regarding organ support. It is known that decision-making varies significantly between clinicians, even where internationally accepted treatment guidance exists and overall the processes and influences on clinical decision-making are poorly understood. Our aim was to summarise the evidence on the decision-making process and the factors that influence organ support decisions in the critical care setting and 2) conduct a meta-synthesis to generate a model of medical decision-making, illustrating how different factors interact and affect the process.
Methods
We conducted a systematic search on three databases (PubMed, Embase and CINAHL) to find relevant papers exploring factors that influenced organ support decisions made by critical care clinicians. A meta-synthesis was then completed on included papers. The data were collated into a common format and cross-compared. This enable the generation of distinct themes/subthemes that were synthesised to develop a higher order interpretation.
Results
33 studies (from 8967 citations) met the inclusion criteria. 21 of these only included nurses, 7 only doctors and 5 were interprofessional. 11 factors that influenced a clinician’s decision-making were identified: experience; professional and personal risk; uncertainty; characteristics of individuals; senior support; team hierarchy; decision making by colleagues; protocols, guidelines and evidence; time and workload; hospital structure; and clinical condition. These were grouped into four themes: human, team, system and patient factors. From our interpretation of the data, we found decision-making is often linear and primarily dictated by disease factors (i.e. patient’s clinical parameters). However, the identified human, team and system factors can place strain on decision-makers and make clinical scenarios more complex. There is scope however to modify these to optimise critical care decision-making.
Conclusion
While decision-making surrounding organ support is complex and dynamic, we identified recurring themes that influenced these decisions across different professions and environments. Further studies should focus on understanding how different decision-making processes directly affect patients’ outcomes.
