MultiPopPred: A Trans-Ethnic Disease Risk Prediction Method, and its Application to the South Asian Population

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have guided significant contributions towards identifying disease associated Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in Caucasian populations, albeit with limited focus on other understudied low-resource non-Caucasian populations. There have been active efforts over the years to understand and exploit the population specific versus shared aspects of the genotype-phenotype relation across different populations or ethnicities to bridge this gap. However, the efficacy of transfer learning models that are simpler than existing approaches and utilize individual-level data remains an open question. We propose MultiPopPred, a novel and simple trans-ethnic polygenic risk score (PRS) estimation method that taps into the shared genetic risk across populations and transfers information learned from multiple well-studied auxiliary populations to a less-studied target population. The default version of MultiPopPred (MPP-PRS+) harnesses individual-level data using a specially designed Nesterov-smoothed penalized shrinkage model and an L-BFGS optimization routine. Extensive comparative analyses performed on simulated genotype-phenotype data, assuming an infinitesimal/omnigenic model, reveal that MPP-PRS+ improves PRS prediction in the South Asian population by 38% on average across all simulation settings when compared to state-of-the-art trans-ethnic PRS estimation methods including SBayesRC-Multi and PROSPER. This improvement is enhanced in settings with low target sample sizes and in semi-simulated settings. These predictive advantages are further echoed in real-world evaluations against 16 UK Biobank quantitative and binary traits. For example, compared to SBayesRC-Multi, MPP-PRS+ achieves comparable performance (within 5% of SOTA performance) on 3 traits, superior performance on 7 other traits, and lags behind on 4 (lipid-related) traits. Neither method could meaningfully predict the remaining 2 traits. MPP-PRS+ maintains a similarly competitive, albeit distinct, performance trend compared to PROSPER. These performance trends are promising and encourage application of MultiPopPred for reliable PRS estimation in low-resource populations with individual-level data for complex omnigenic traits.

Article activity feed