Distinct optimization of motor control and learning: Self-paced motor learning achieves different motor patterns from overtrained

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Self-paced movement, resulting from extensive training and optimization, serves as an ideal model for investigating internal objectives without external constraints within the sensorimotor system. Previous studies have shown that the self-paced movement is consistent within individuals but inconsistent across individuals, highlighting a robust, unique optimization in motor control. Although motor learning is similarly an optimization process, it is unknown whether the internal objectives are shared with motor control and learning, i.e., whether it replicates the motor patterns identified by self-paced motor control. As the optimality principles typically address redundancy, a human behavioral experiment was designed to equate movement distance for motor control and learning, comparing redundant motion parameters, movement velocity, and duration, through detailed analysis that accommodates their nonlinear interaction and significant inter-individual baseline differences. Participants, instructed to use their preferred velocities and duration, exhibited minimal intra-individual variability in motion parameters. Notably, visuomotor shift perturbations exclusively affected velocity, while changes in target distances affected both velocity and duration. These findings suggest that the sensorimotor system employs distinct optimization mechanisms for motor control and learning to resolve redundancy.

Significance statement

Our natural behaviors are thought to be well-optimized. Self-paced movements, a major form of the behaviors, demonstrate significant stability within individuals but vary across individuals, suggesting that the sensorimotor system in the central nervous system operates a unique and robust optimization involved in self-paced motor control. Self-paced motor control is further refined during the motor learning process. However, it is unknown whether motor control and learning share a common objective function. We demonstrated that laboratory-based motor learning never resulted in identical motor patterns from the overtrained movements with natural instruction. Thus, the sensorimotor system would employ distinct optimization mechanisms for motor control and learning, suggesting that these processes are not contiguous.

Article activity feed