Subcellular context-specific tuning of actomyosin ring contractility within a common cytoplasm

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

The non-muscle actomyosin cytoskeleton generates contractile force through the dynamic rearrangement of its constituent parts. Actomyosin rings are a specialization of the non-muscle actomyosin cytoskeleton that drive cell shape changes during division, wound healing, and other events. Contractile rings throughout phylogeny and in a range of cellular contexts are built from conserved components including non-muscle myosin II (NMMII), actin filaments (F-actin), and crosslinking proteins. However, it is unknown whether diverse actomyosin rings close via a single unifying mechanism. To explore how contractile forces are generated by actomyosin rings, we studied three instances of ring closure within the common cytoplasm of the C. elegans oogenic germline: mitotic cytokinesis of germline stem cells (GSCs), apoptosis of meiotic compartments, and cellularization of oocytes. We found that each ring type closed with unique kinetics, protein density and abundance dynamics. These measurements suggested that the mechanism of contractile force generation varied across the subcellular contexts. Next, we formulated a physical model that related the forces generated by filament-filament interactions to the material properties of these rings that dictate the kinetics of their closure. Using this framework, we related the density of conserved cytoskeletal proteins anillin and NMMII to the kinematics of ring closure. We fitted model rings to in situ measurements to estimate parameters that are currently experimentally inaccessible, such as the asymmetric distribution of protein along the length of F-actin, which occurs naturally due to differences in the dimensions of the crosslinker and NMMII filaments. Our work predicted that the role of NMMII varies across these ring types, due in part to its distribution along F-actin and motoring. Our model also predicted that the degree of contractility and the impact of ring material properties on contractility differs among ring types.

Article activity feed