Effects of copepod chemical cues on intra- and extracellular toxins in two species of Dinophysis

Copepods may contribute to harmful algal bloom formation by selectively rejecting harmful cells. Additionally, copepods and the chemical cues they exude, copepodamides, have been shown to induce increased toxin production in paralytic and amnesic toxin producing microalgae. However, it is unknown if diarrhetic shellfish toxin (DST) producers such as Dinophysis respond to copepods or copepodamides in a similar fashion. Here we expose laboratory cultures of Dinophysis sacculus and D. acuminata to direct grazing by Acartia sp. copepods or copepodamides and measure their toxins after three days. Total DSTs increased by 8 - 45% in D. sacculus but was significantly different from controls only in the highest (10 nM) copepodamide treatment whereas toxin content was not affected in D. acuminata . Growth rate was low across all groups and explained up to 91% of the variation in toxin content. DSTs were redistributed from internal compartments to the extracellular medium in the highest copepodamide treatments (5 - 10 nM), which were two to three times higher than controls and indicates an active release or passive leakage of toxins. Untargeted analysis of endometabolomes indicated significant changes in metabolite profiles for both species in response to the highest copepodamide treatments, independent of known toxins. However, it is not clear whether these are stress responses or caused by more complex mechanisms. The relatively small grazer-induced effect in Dinophysis observed here, compared to several species of Alexandrium and Pseudo-nitzschia reported previously, suggests that DST production in Dinophysis is likely not induced by copepods, except perhaps in patches with high copepod densities. DSTs may, however, represent a constitutive chemical defence for Dinophysis , or serve an altogether different purpose.